PARTICIPATORY LAND USE CONFLICT RESOLUTION: EFFORTS TOWARDS COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE MANAGEMENT
Article History
Submited : June 22, 2021
Published : July 16, 2021
This research aims to determine the causes of land-use conflicts and formulate a participatory conflict resolution model of the Forest Management Unit (KPH) of Kulawi. Through interviews with respondents using the purposive sampling method. The study included the community around the forest area, local government, KPH, Department of Agriculture, BPDAS-HL, and local government. Data analysis was stakeholder's and land use conflict by using problem trees analysis. The study results show that the battle occurred not only because of the community's factor of accessing the area illegally but also because the KPH has not performed its function correctly. Some factors cause enforcement's failure, such as lack of understanding of the area and community empowerment. Some alternative solutions desired by the community: (1) The government through related agencies should supervise forest areas, (2) Clear boundaries between community-owned land, villages, and forest areas, (3) Community empowerment by utilizing potential forest product resources and (4) Granting management rights to community's forest claimed by the community. There are two models of conflict resolution to be offered. First, the KPH needs the collaboration of parties to resolve land-use conflicts. Second, community involvement as the main subject is significant in every stage of conflict resolution. The KPH supports improving community capacity related to competence in conflict resolution is indispensable.
Batunacun, Wieland, R., Lakes, T., Yunfeng, H., Nendel, C., 2019. Identifying drivers of land degradation in Xilingol, China, between 1975 and 2015. Land Use Policy 83, 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.013
Baynes, J., Herbohn, J., Smith, C., Fisher, R., Bray, D., 2015. Key factors which influence the success of community forestry in developing countries. Global Environmental Change 35, 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.011
Bonsu, N.O., Dhubháin, Á.N., O’Connor, D., 2019. Understanding forest resource conflicts in Ireland: A case study approach. Land Use Policy 80, 287–297. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.11.009
Bray, D.B., 2015. Community Forestry as a Strategy for Sustainable Management, in: Working Forests in the Neotropics. Columbia University Press, pp. 221–237.
Chankrajang, T., 2019. State-community property-rights sharing in forests and its contributions to environmental outcomes: Evidence from Thailand’s community forestry. Journal of Development Economics 138, 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jdeveco.2019.01.010
Ece, M., Murombedzi, J., Ribot, J., 2017. Disempowering Democracy: Local Representation in Community and Carbon Forestry in Africa. Conservation and Society. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_16_103
Endah Ambarwati, M., Sasongko, G., M.A Therik, W., 2018. Dynamics of The Tenurial Conflict in State Forest Area (Case in BKPH Tanggung KPH Semarang). Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan 6. https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v6i2.23228
Fisher, L.A., Kim, Y.-S., Latifah, S., Mukarom, M., 2017. Managing Forest Conflicts: Perspectives of Indonesia’s Forest Management Unit Directors. F.S. 1, 8. https://doi.org/ 10.24259/fs.v1i1.772
García-López, G., Antinori, C., 2018. Between Grassroots Collective Action and State Mandates: The Hybridity of Multi-Level Forest Associations in Mexico. Conservation and Society 16, 193. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_16_115
Gautam, A.P., Webb, E.L., Eiumnoh, A., 2002. GIS Assessment of Land Use/Land Cover Changes Associated With Community Forestry Implementation in the Middle Hills of Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 22, 63–69. https://doi.org/ 10.1659/0276- 4741(2002)022[0063:GAOLUL]2.0.CO;2
Golar, Basir-Cyio, M., Rusydi, M., Bakri, R., Bohari, Pratama, M.F., Laihi, M.A.A., 2019a. Gold Mining and its Impact on Agricultural Land, Public Health, Violation of the Law: A Study on Poboya Traditional Mining, Palu, Indonesia. Ind. Jour. of Publ. Health Rese. & Develop. 10, 924. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2019.02939.5
Golar, G., Malik, A., Muis, H., Herman, A., Nurudin, N., Lukman, L., 2020. The social-economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic: implications for potential forest degradation. Heliyon 6, e05354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05354
Golar, Mahfudz, Malik, A., Muis, H., Khairil, M., Ali, S.S.S., Razman, M.R., Awang, A., 2019b. The adaptive-collaborative as a strategy comunications for conflict resolution on the National Park 8.
Handoko, C., Yumantoko, Y., 2015. Local perspectives on tenure rights and conflict in FMU Rinjani Barat, West Nusa Tenggara Province. Jurnal Penelitian Kehutanan Wallacea 4, 157. https://doi.org/10.18330/jwallacea.2015.vol4iss2pp157-170
Harun, M.K., Dwiprabowo, H., 2014. Model resolusi konflik lahan di Kesatuan Pemangkuan Hutan Produksi Model Banjar 11, 16.
Ioki, K., Din, N.M., Ludwig, R., James, D., Hue, S.W., Johari, S.A., Awang, R.A., Anthony, R., Phua, M.-H., 2019. Supporting forest conservation through community-based land use planning
and participatory GIS – lessons from Crocker Range Park, Malaysian Borneo. Journal for Nature Conservation 52, 125740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2019.125740
Irawan, A., Iwanuddin, I., Elsjoni Halawane, J., Ekawati, S., 2017. Analisis persepsi dan perilaku masyarakat terhadap keberadaan kawasan KPHP model POIGAR. JPSEK 14, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2017.14.1.71-82
Irawan, A., Mairi, K., Ekawati, S., 2016. Analysis Of Tenurial Conflict In Production Forest Management Unit (Pfmu) Model Poigar. j. wasian 3, 79. https://doi.org/10.20886/ jwas.v3i2.1595
Islam, K., Nath, T.K., Jashimuddin, M., Rahman, Md.F., 2019. Forest dependency, co-management and improvement of peoples’ livelihood capital: Evidence from Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh. Environmental Development 32, 100456. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.envdev.2019.100456
Isoaho, K., Burgas, D., Janasik, N., Mönkkönen, M., Peura, M., Hukkinen, J.I., 2019. Changing forest stakeholders’ perception of ecosystem services with linguistic nudging. Ecosystem Services 40, 101028. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecoser.2019.101028
Kuckertz, A., 2019. Let’s take the entrepreneurial ecosystem metaphor seriously! Journal of Business
Venturing Insights 11, e00124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00124
Martínez-Espinosa, C., Wolfs, P., Vande Velde, K., Satyanarayana, B., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Hugé, J., 2020. Call for a collaborative management at Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve, Malaysia: An assessment from local stakeholders’ view point. Forest Ecology and Management 458, 117741. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.foreco.2019.117741
Meyer, M.A., 2020. The role of resilience in food system studies in low- and middle-income countries. Global Food Security 24, 100356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100356
Okumu, B., Muchapondwa, E., 2020. Determinants of successful collective management of forest resources: Evidence from Kenyan Community Forest Associations. Forest Policy and Economics 113, 102122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102122
Paudel, J., 2018. Community-Managed Forests, Household Fuelwood Use and Food Consumption.
Ecological Economics 147, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecolecon.2018.01.003
Reed, J., Barlow, J., Carmenta, R., van Vianen, J., Sunderland, T., 2019. Engaging multiple stakeholders to reconcile climate, conservation and development objectives in tropical landscapes. Biological Conservation 238, 108229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.
2019.108229
Riggs, R.A., Sayer, J., Margules, C., Boedhihartono, A.K., Langston, J.D., Sutanto, H., 2016. Forest tenure and conflict in Indonesia: Contested rights in Rempek Village, Lombok. Land Use Policy 57, 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.002
Roberts, K., 2016. It Takes a Rooted Village: Networked Resistance, Connected Communities, and Adaptive Responses to Forest Tenure Reform in Northern Thailand. Austrian Journal of South - East Asian Studies 9, 53.
Sahide, M.A.K., Fisher, M.R., Maryudi, A., Wong, G.Y., Supratman, S., Alam, S., 2019. The bureaucratic politics of conservation in governing land conflict: A typology of capacities. MethodsX 6, 2536–2543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.10.022
Senoaji, G., Hidayat, M.F., Iskandar, I., 2020. Resolusi konflik tenurial pemanfaatan kawasan hutan di hutan lindung Rimbo Donok Kabupaten Kepahiyang (The Tenurial Conflicts Resolution of Utilization of Forest Areas in Protected Forests Rimbo Donok Kepahiang District). J. Manusia & Lingkungan 26, 28. https://doi.org/ 10.22146/jml.29250
Suhadi, 2018. The Use of Forest Areas for Infrastructure Development under Leasehold Forest Area License: A Sustainable Development Perspective. SHS Web of Conferences 54, 3013. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185403013
van Haren, N., Fleiner, R., Liniger, H., Harari, N., 2019. Contribution of community-based initiatives to the sustainable development goal of Land Degradation Neutrality. Environmental Science & Policy 94, 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.envsci.2018.12.017
Yasmi, Y., Kelley, L., Enters, T., Regional Community Forestry Training Center for Asia-Pacific (Bangkok, T., 2010. Conflict over forests and land in Asia: impacts, causes, and management. RECOFTC, Bangkok.
Yusran, Y., Sahide, M.A.K., Supratman, S., Sabar, A., Krott, M., Giessen, L., 2017. The empirical visibility of land use conflicts: From latent to manifest conflict through law enforcement in a national park in Indonesia. Land Use Policy 62, 302–315. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.033