THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ZONING IN CLOSED-HOUSE CAGES ON MICROCLIMATE CONDITIONS AND BROILER PERFORMANCE

Article History

Submited : May 6, 2024
Published : July 2, 2024

Broiler chickens are one of the producers of animal protein that is in great demand by the public and has high productivity but has the disadvantage of being susceptible to disease due to environmental conditions and poor maintenance systems. To minimize environmental conditions, it is necessary to use closed-house cages. Closed-house cages have zones in them that have different conditions. Zoning in cages has different temperatures, humidity, speed, and ammonia levels and affects broiler performance.  This study aims to determine the effect of different zoning on microclimate conditions and broiler performance in closed-house cages. This research was carried out from June 9, 2023 – to July 6, 2023, at the closed-house cage “Chicken Farm Janna” in Taipa Village, North Palu District, Palu City, Central Sulawesi Province. This study used 396 broiler samples aged 1-28 days with a DOC (Day-old chick) weight of ± 37 grams/head. The strain used is Lohman produced by PT. Japfa Comfeed Indonesia. This study used a t-test with 2 treatments and 9 repeats. The treatment studied is Z1 = Zone 1-60 meters from the inlet and Z2 = Zone 60-120 meters from the inlet. The results of the t-test show that different zoning has a significant influence (t count >t table) on microclimate conditions and broiler performance in closed-house cages. Different zoning exerts a real influence on microclimate conditions and the performance of broilers in closed-house cages. In the closed house cage, the zone opposite the inlet (zone 2) results in a temperature rise, a rise in ammonia levels, a drop in humidity, a loss in body weight, and an increase in mortality.

Alfiandy, S., D. S Permana, A. W. Nurjaman, W. G. Kurnia, L. Prastika, H and H. Panggabean and A. Endrawan. (2020). Climate Analysis of Central Sulawesi Province based on BMKG Automatic Weather Monitoring Data. GAW Bariri Bulletin. Vol.1 (1): 1-11
Arnandha, Y and A. Rakhmawati. (2019). Testing of Physical and Mechanical Properties of Wood Plastic Composite (WPC) from Teak Wood Waste and HDPE Plastic. Retrieved October 10, 2022. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341669174 Physical and Mechanical Properties Testing Wood Plastic Composite WPC from Teak Wood Waste and HDPE Plastic
Cobb. 2018. Cobb Broiler Management Guide Book. L-038-01-21 EN. Retrieved November 25, 2022. https://www.cobb-vantress.com/assets/5c7576a214/Broiler-guide-R1.pdf
Daryatmo. 2021. Performance of Broiler Chickens at Different Inlet Spacing in Closed House Type Cages. Journal of Animal Science. Vol.15 (1): 25-30
Dewanti, A.C., E.P. Santosa and K. Nova. (2014). Effect of Different Types of Litter Material on Physiological Responses of Finisher Phase Broilers in Closed House. Scientific Journal of Integrated Livestock. Vol.2 (3): 81-87
Fatmaningsih, R., Riyanti, &; Khaira, N. (2016). Performance of Broilers on Conventional Brooding Systems and Thermos. Scientific Journal of Integrated Livestock, 4(3), 222–229.
Hidayat, A., T. Bachelor and S.Kismiati. 2020. Effect of Microclimatic Ammonia in Different Zones in Broiler Chicken Closed House Cages in the Dry Season on Carcass Display. Indonesian Journal of Livestock Science. 15(1): 60-66
I, M., S., Mahardika, I. G., &; Sudiastra, I. W. (2019). Evaluation of Broiler Chicken Production Raised with a Closed House System. Livestock Scientific Magazine, 22(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.24843/mip.2019.v22.i01.p05
Jannah, M.L., T.A. Bachelor and E. Suprijatna. (2020). The Effect of Microclimatic Spatial Changes of Ammonia on Different Cage Placement and Length on the Performance of Broiler Chickens in the Starter Period. Scientific Journal of Integrated Livestock. Vol.8 (1): 14-20
Jaya, C.R.M., R.R. Riyanti, D. Septinova and K. Nova. (2022). Moisture Content, pH, Temperature, and Ammonia Content in Litter in Two Different Zoning in Closed House Cages. Journal of Livestock Research and Innovation. Vol.6 (2): 129-135
Maliselo, P.S. and G.K. Nkonde. (2015). Ammonia Production in Poultry Houses and Its Effect on the Growth of Gallus gallus domestica (Broiler Chickens): A case study of a small scale poultry house in Riverside, Kitwe, Zambia. International Journal of Scientific &; Technology Research 4(4): 141-145
Marom, A. T., U. Kalsum and U. Ali. (2017). Evaluation of Broiler Performance in Close House and Open House Cage Systems with Different Altitudes. Dynamics of Rekasatwa. 2 (2) : 1-10
Metasari, T., D. Septinova and V. Wanniatie. (2012). The Effect of Different Types of Litter Materials on the Quality of Finisher Phase Broiler Litter in Closed House. Scientific Journal of Integrated Livestock. 3(2): 23-29
Metasari, T., D. Septinova and V. Wanniatie. (2014). Effects of Various Types of Litter Materials on The Litter Quality for Broiler during The Finisher Phase in Closed House. Scientific Journal of Integrated Livestock. Vol.5 (18): 23–29
Nurhidayat, F., L.D. Mahfusz and D. Sunarti. (2020). Effects of Land Differences on Carcass Production of Broiler Chickens Raised in Closed House Cages. Indonesian Journal of Livestock Science. Vol.15 (4): 406-413
Palupi, R. (2015). Management Overcoming Heat Stress in Broiler Chickens Raised on Dry Land. Proceeding National Seminar on Suboptimal Land 2015. SBN: 979-587-580-9
Puspani, E., Nuriyasa, I. ., Wibawa, A. A. . P., & Candrawati, D. P. M. . (2018). The influence of cage floor type and livestock density on broiler feeding habits aged 2-6 weeks. Scientific Journal of Livestock, 11(1), 7–11.
Son, N.G., R. Maulana and H. Fitriyah. (2018). Cage Automation in order to Minimize Heat Stress in Broiler Chickens with the Naïve Bayes Method. Journal of Information Technology Development and Computer Science. Vol.2 (1): 387-394
Rachmawati, S. 2000. Environmental Processing Efforts for Chicken Farming Business. Veterinary Research Institute.Wartazoa. Vol.9 (2): 73-80
Renata, R., Bachelor, T. A., &; Kismiati, S. (2018). The effect of Zoning in Closed House Cages on Ammonia Levels and Its Impact on Broiler Meat Quality in the Rainy Season. Journal of Animal Sciences, 28(3), 183. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiip.2018.028.03.01
Santoso, H and Sudaryani, T. (2009). Broiler Rearing in an Open Stage Cage. Self-help Spreader, Jakarta
Saputra, M.R., T.A. Bachelor and S. Kismiati. (2020). Microclimatic Changes in Ammonia and Litter Conditions of Broiler Chickens in the Starter Period Due to Different Cage Lengths. Journal of Animal Science Research. Vol.18 (1): 8-14
Suasta, I., I.G. Mahardika and I.W. Sudiastra. (2019). Evaluation of Broiler Chicken Production Raised aith a Closed House System. Livestock Scientific Magazine. Vol.22 (1): 21-24
Suherman, D., Muryanto, S., &; Sulistyowati, E. (2017). Microclimate Evaluation in Housing Using Different Height Level Roof Related to Physiological Responses of Mature Bali Cattle in District XIV Koto Mukomuko District. Indonesian Journal of Animal Science Science, 12(4), 397.
Sumarno., W.Yatnonius and S. Nonok. (2022). Study of Broiler Performance in Closed House and Open House Cage Systems. Journal of Agriextensia. Vol.21 (1): 42-50
Ustomo, E. 2016. 99% fail beternal laying hens. Print I, Self-Help Spreader, Jakarta
Utama, C.S., F. Wahyono, and M.F. Haidar. (2021). The Effect of Land Differences on the Litter Profile of Broiler Chickens Raised in Closed House Cages. Indonesian Journal of Livestock. Vol.23 (2): 115-121
Woro, I. D., Atmomarsono, U. and Muryani, R. (2019). The Effect of Maintenance on Different Cage Densities on the Performance of Broiler Chickens. Indonesian Journal of Animal Science Science, 14(4), 418–423. https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.14.4.418-423
Younis, S., P.A. Geraert, M. Lessire, M.B. Cerre and S. Guillaumin. (2016). Effect of High Ambient Temperature on Feed Digestibility in Broilers. Poultry Science. Vol.76 (6): 857-863
Rahmawati, S., Mozin, S., Damayanti, A., Hatta, U., Sarjuni, S., & Adjis, M. (2024). THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ZONING IN CLOSED-HOUSE CAGES ON MICROCLIMATE CONDITIONS AND BROILER PERFORMANCE. AGROLAND The Agricultural Sciences Journal (e-Journal), 11(1). https://doi.org/10.22487/agroland.v11i1.2168
Fulltext