The Role Of Coprophagous Beetles On Dung Decomposition And Enhacement Soil Fertility: Effect Of Body Size, Species Diversity And Biomass

Article History

Submited : July 17, 2020
Published : July 17, 2020

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh keragaman spesies, ukuran dan biomassa kumbang koprofagus dalam merombak kotoran hewan dan meningkatkan kesuburan tanah. Percobaan dilakukan menggunakan Rancangan Acak Lengkap dengan perlakuan jumlah dan panjang tubuh spesies kumbang koprofagus. Peubah tergantung yang diamati adalah persentase kotoran yang terdekomposisi dan kadar bahan organik serta N,P,K total tanah sebagai indikator kesuburan tanah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persentase kotoran hewan yang terdekomposisi lebih dipengaruhi oleh ukuran dan biomassa kumbang yang terlibat dibandingkan dengan jumlah spesies. Persentase kotoran yang terdekomposisi berkorelasi positif dengan ukuran kumbang koprofagus. Kadar N,P,K total tanah meningkat mengikuti jumlah kotoran hewan yang terdekomposisi yang mengindikasikan bahwa aktifitas perombakan kotoran hewan oleh kumbang koprofagus berpengaruh positif terhadap kesuburan tanah.

Anonim. 1980. Pemetaan tanah dan survei lingkungan. Term of Reference Type B. Lembaga Penelitian Tanah. Jakarta.

Andresen E. 2002. Dung beetles in a Central Amazonian rainforest and their ecological role as secondary seed dispersers. Ecological Entomology 27: 257-270.

Andresen E. 2003. Effect of forest fragmentation on dung beetle communities and functional consequences for plant regeneration. Ecography 26(1): 87-97.

Davis ALV and Scholtz CH. 2001. Historical vs. ecological factors influencing global patterns of scarabaeine dung beetle diversity. Diversity and Distributions 7: 161–174.

Doube BM, Giller PS, and Moola F. 1988. Dung burial strategies in some South African coprine and onitine dung beetles (Scarabaeidae:Scarabaeinae). Ecological Entomology 13: 251–261.

Doube BM. 1990. A functional classification analysis of the structure of dung beetle assemblages. Ecological Entomology 15: 371–383.

Fincher GT. 1981. The potential value of dung beetles in pasture ecosystems. Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society 16: 301-316.

Gittings T, PS Giller and G Stakelum. 1994. Dung decomposition in contrasting temperate pastures in relation to dung beetle and earth worm activity. Pedobiologia 38: 455-474.

Hanski I and Cambefort Y, editor. 1991. Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Hanski I and J. Krikken. 1991. Dung beetles in tropical forests in South-East Asia. In: Hanski, I. and Y. Cambefort, (eds.), Dung Beetle Ecology. Princeton: Princeton University Press

Horgan FG. 2005. Effects of deforestation on diversity, biomass and function of dung beetles on the eastern slopes of the Peruvian Andes. Forest Ecology and Management 216: 117–133.

Jankielsohn A, Scholtz CH, Louw SVDM. 2001. Effect of habitat transformation on dung beetle assemblages: A comparison between a south african nature reserve and neighboring farms. Environmental Entomology 30 (3): 474-483.

Klein BC. 1989. Effects of forest fragmentation on dung and carrion beetle communities in Central Amazonia. Ecology 70: 1715-1725.

Larsen TH and Forsyth A. 2005. Trap spacing and transect design for dung beetle biodiversity studies. Biotropica 37(2): 322–325.

Larsen TH, Williams NM, and Kremen C. 2005. Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. Ecology Letters 8: 538–547.

Lee JM. and Peng YS. 1981. Influence of adult size of Onthophagus gazella on manure pat degradation, nest construction, and progeny size..Environmental Entomology 10: 626–630.

Losey JE, Vaughan M. 2006. The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. BioScience 56 (4): 311-323.

Mills LS, ME Soule and DF Doak. 1993. The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation. BioScience, 43 (4): 219.

Miranda CHB, Do Santos JCC and Bianchin I. 1998. Contribution of Onthophagus gazella to soil fertility improvement by bovine fecal mass incorporation into the soil. 1. Greenhouse studies. Rev. Brasil. Zootec. 27: 681-685.

Miranda CHB, dos Santos JC and Bianchin. 2001. The role of Digitonthophagus gazella in pasture cleaning and production as a result of burial of cattle dung. Pasturas Tropicales. 22 (1):14-18.

Mittal IC. 1993. Natural manuring and soil conditioning by dung beetles. Tropical Ecology 34: 150-159.

Omaliko CPE. 1984. Dung decomposition and its effects on the soil component of a tropical grassland ecosystem. Tropical Ecology 25: 214-220.

Rosenfeld JS 2002. Functional redundancy in ecology and conservation. Oikos 98: 156–162.

Sanchez MAB, Grez AA, Simonetti JA. 2004. Dung decomposition and associated beetles in a fragmented temperate forest. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural. 77: 107-120.

Slade EM, Mann DJ, Villanueva JF, and Lewis OT. 2007. Experimental evidence for the effects of dung beetle functional group richness and composition on ecosystem function in a tropical forest. Journal of Animal Ecology.

57
Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, Johnston CT, Summer ME. 1996. Methods of soil analysis Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison USA.

Thomas ML. 2001. Dung beetle benefits in the pasture ecosystem. NCAT Agriculture Intern. www.attra.org/attrapub/PDF/dungbeetle.pdf [Januari 2003].

Tyndale-Biscoe M and Vogt WG 1996. Population status of the bush fly and native dung beetles in south-eastern Australia in relation to establishment of exotic dung beetles. Bulletin of Entomological Research 86: 183-192.

Yokohama K, Kai H, Tsuchiyama H. 1991. Paracoprid dung beetles and gaseous loss of nitrogen from cow dung. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 23 (7):. 643-647.

Wilson J. 1998. A summary of interaction in dung beetle-soil-plant relationship. http://www.esb.utexas.edu/wilson/Bot 394/index.htm.

Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. 4th edition. Prentice-Hall Inc. New Jersey.USA
Shahabuddin, S. (2020). The Role Of Coprophagous Beetles On Dung Decomposition And Enhacement Soil Fertility: Effect Of Body Size, Species Diversity And Biomass. Agroland: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian, 15(1), 51 - 57. Retrieved from http://jurnal.faperta.untad.ac.id/index.php/agrolandnasional/article/view/485
Fulltext